View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26th October, 2002, 05:58 AM
SkuLLy|RT's Avatar
SkuLLy|RT SkuLLy|RT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: October 2002
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 13
Send a message via AIM to SkuLLy|RT

4G4A+ Onboard RAID Performance

My sys setup -

1.6A @ default clock
Epox 4G4A+ w/ 4.24 BIOS
Highpoint 372 Raid BIOS v2.31
2x60GB IBM 60GXP drives
WinXP PRO driver v2.34
512mb GEiL PC3500 Plat

I went ahead and set up a RAID 0 array, using 64k striping size. Installed WinXP PRO. Installation was pretty quick, Sisoft Sandra even posted some blazing results.

There were a few things that I did notice though. 1st, at the initial XP loading screen (the black one with the xp logo and lil blue bar under it), there seemed to be a bit of lag. A faint logo would appear, and then a few seconds later, the logo would finish loading accompanied by hard drive access. The 2nd thing that I noticed, was that in games, there was a lot of hard drive access, which resulted in frames going from 190 to 9 and such. Not a very pleasant gaming experience when anytime something needs to be loaded, the hard drives start accessing themselves and the game slows to a hault.

I wanted to know if anyone had any similar experiences with the onboard RAID device. I realize that onboard RAID is probably the equivalent of using a winmodem, but I did expect better performance from it.

It should also be noted that when I had my cpu clocked to 2.4GHz, performance did not change, still tons and tons of hard drive access, and lots and lots of in game slowdowns.

- SkuLLy

EDIT :: Forgot to mention this earlier. I also attempted to run the drives as normal IDE devices from the onboard RAID headers, with the same results. Delay in loading Windows, lots of access to the hard drive / eating cpu cycles in games. I am currently running my system off of the INTEL IDE headers, and everything works smoothly. Sandra scores are nowhere near what they should be, but games run smooth, and Windows loads without delay.
__________________

Last edited by SkuLLy|RT : 26th October, 2002 at 06:04 AM.
Reply With Quote