View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 18th October, 2003, 04:27 PM
mookydooky's Avatar
mookydooky mookydooky is offline
AOA Staff
 
Join Date: December 2001
Location: Everywhere you want to be.
Posts: 7,903
Send a message via MSN to mookydooky

Quote:
Originally Posted by Staz
What do you think? Do you think it will be as powerful as it could have been with the focus being on tobaco. Or do you think the context of the trial itself is secondairy to the overall story?
Actually, as topics go, I think gun control is almost, if not equally, controversial. I just happen to have a more personal relationship with tobacco compared to guns. Hell, I've never even owned a real gun. I'm sure if I grew up in one of those gun states, I would have different outlook. As things stand though, guns are not really that important to me.

I think though, that the movie would have had a greater impact with tobacco but only if it was made several years ago. Big Tobacco has lost several cases since 1998 I believe. Then there was the $200+ billion settlement with the states. I believe there are additional cases out there too that are currently underway. I think events like that would lower the impact of Big Tobacco as the defendant in this movie.

I haven't seen the movie yet, so I can't really comment as to whether the gun control issue is handled well, but I personally would have preferred tobacco as the main issue.
__________________
Need a laugh? Take a peek at
AOA's Mookydooky's "Just for laughs!" Joke Topic


AOA Team fah

我喜欢大屁股, 我不能骗你..... 他们弟兄不能否认......
Reply With Quote