View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 30th October, 2004, 05:41 AM
alexkerhead's Avatar
alexkerhead alexkerhead is offline
Member/Contributer
 
Join Date: June 2004
Location: Montgomery, AL USA
Posts: 3,018
Send a message via MSN to alexkerhead

Quote:
Originally Posted by DimViesel
Alex I want to understand what the sentiment in that post is accurately:
Are you saying that you feel that AMD's claims that their CPUs were equivalent to Intel's in terms of performance, even when taking into account the lower clock speeds, sat really badly with you?
Do you feel some 'release' to see AMD's latest cpus not being able to outperform the higher clocked P4's (which are also now cheaper, in price to perf. comparison) ?
The 'bang for buck song' is the statement I find emotionally charged - it irked you that this was the, foundless, selling point of these processors?
Yu dont have to reply to my post, you can in fact put me in your ignore list.
and lazgoat, that P4 system looks mighty nice, I would go for it.
__________________
Linux(Ubuntu) and Windows(XP) User. Dual-Booting.
Desktop: Intel E6600 2.4Ghz@3.2GHz(355MHz*9@1.3V), 6GB G. Skill DDR2-800(4-4-4-12 2T@2.0V), EVGA Nforce 680i LT SLI, NVIDIA 8500GT 512MB(500MHz Core + 450MHz Mem) etc, etc.

AOA Team fah
Reply With Quote