[MietmaN]

11x166, FSB166 ROMSIP table
V-core 1.30v, 2x512MB dual 2-3-3-11, Win2k SP4, nVidia unified drivers 4.27, Catalyst 4.12 (balanced settings), DirectX 9.0c

* Sandra 2004 SP1
Int : 2549 MB/s, 2552 MB/s (95-96% efficiency)
Float : 2393 MB/s, 2401 MB/s (90% efficiency)

* Everest Home
read - 2581 MB/s
write - 993 MB/s

* 3DMark 2001SE
16063, 16147, 16125

* SuperPI
2M - 02m 05s
16M - 23m 12s


11x200, FSB166 ROMSIP table
V-core 1.50v, 2x512MB dual 2-3-3-11, Win2k SP4, nVidia unified drivers 4.27, Catalyst 4.12 (balanced settings), DirectX 9.0c

* Sandra 2004 SP1
Int : 3070 MB/s, 3071 MB/s (96% efficiency)
Float : 2877 MB/s, 2891 MB/s (90% efficiency)

* Everest Home
read - 3108, 3112 MB/s
write - 1196, 1204 MB/s

* 3DMark 2001SE
18535, 18617, 18614, 18545, 18692

* SuperPI
2M - 01m 44s, 01m 44s
16M - 19m 22s, 19m, 23s


11x200, FSB200 ROMSIP table
V-core 1.50v, 2x512MB dual 2-3-3-11, Win2k SP4, nVidia unified drivers 4.27, Catalyst 4.12 (balanced settings), DirectX 9.0c

* Sandra 2004 SP1
Int : 2864 MB/s, 2870 MB/s (90% efficiency)
Float : 2684 MB/s, 2693 MB/s (84% efficiency)

* Everest Home
read - 2863, 2871 MB/s
write - 1107, 1109 MB/s

* 3DMark 2001SE
18058, 18106, 18198, 18270

* SuperPI
2M - 01m 46s, 01m 46s
16M - X

I used 8rdavcore to overclock from within Windows. At FSB200 my PC was rock stable while using FSB166 ROMSIP table, but I couldn't get much higher - at 210Mhz it didn't even pass 3Dmark. From this reason I find OCing with hlep of 8rdavcore just a temporary solution.

Overclocking normally, I found 11x198 to be at the same level of performance and memory bandwidth (if not a little bit better) as 10.5x210 (using the same timings 2.5-3-3-11 for objectiveness). Shortly, FSB200 ROMSIP table is a disaster in my opinion and takes away all fun I have with this particular mobo.

finito