View Single Post
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 3rd February, 2005, 03:27 PM
MietmaN's Avatar
MietmaN MietmaN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: January 2005
Location: Heidelberg (DE), Kraków (PL)
Posts: 413

@ Naibot - excellent work!!!!

It seems that :

At FSB200, according to the tests made by Wolf2000me, the higher multiplier the better memory performace, although the differences are rather small. I think this is something really good, because at this FSB people overclock only with multi (providing they have got some crappy memory sticks). This goes for both Sandra and Everest tests.

At higher FSB the diffrences remain the same and then become to be a little larger, but who of us is gonna use a multi like 8.5x ? - Sandra 2005. On the other hand the Everest resutls (especially those of "write" and "delay") are really crazy
and I can't comment them better than you did

@ All :

I've just sent another PM to Merlin, with all the observed issues (cold boot, S3 & hibernation), all test you've done (including those of Naibot) and our expectations (our ill desire to reach higher FSB ). When he answers, I'll let you know.
__________________
AMD AXP-M 11x220 1.675v| Epox 8RDA3+ PRO 1.4| Thermalright SLK900U /Y.S.Tech 92mm|
2x512MB Mushkin PC3200 L.II V2| Sapphire Radeon 9800 PRO@XT| S.B. Live 5.1| Maxtor 120GB|
Seagate 80GB| Teac CD-W540E| Asus DVD| BeQuiet Blackline 450W| Chieftec BX| Iiyama HM704UTc|
Reply With Quote