View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 19th June, 2006, 09:26 AM
Allan's Avatar
Allan Allan is offline
Member/Contributer
 
Join Date: September 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,855

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveI
Very interesting point Allan. I'll have to do some digging. I am going to do some serious upgrading this summer, but I'm leaning toward conroes. I want duallies.... and bang for the buck, I think Intel may be the better value. However, I want a complete picture. High memory bandwidth is never a bad thing, but it seems there is an artificially high number of models out there.

Can you translate "odd" for me?
Odd, as in an odd number, not an even number. For example, the 5000+ has a multi of 13x.

200 FSB * 13 = 2600 MHz for each core.

You need to find a suitable level for the RAM, wanting to hit 400 MHz. This means that:
2600/6 = 433, which is too much.
2600/7 = 371, which is too low. (742 MHz as I mentioned in the first post)

There is no sweet spot hitting 400 MHz, so you will find your RAM running an underclocked speed. Gimme a few days to play with this setup, and I will see how it handles to be overclocked.
__________________
AOA Team fah
Reply With Quote