View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 16th March, 2007, 04:06 PM
cadaveca cadaveca is offline
Member/Contributor/Resident Crystal Ball
 
Join Date: March 2004
Posts: 7,451

Quote:
Originally Posted by keithwalton
2643 for the core 2, and 2319 for the opty is hardly the same score considering they're clocked at the same speed. Thats more than a 10% gap in performance.

Is it a futuremark bug in it reading your core 2 having a 266fsb ? unless you have an unlocked e6600 that should be 333mhz fsb to hit 3GHz.

When i ran '06 back when my computer was air cooled i got 3066 for the cpu bench with my core 2 at 3.5GHz,
whats do you get with your e6600 at 3.8GHz Dave ?
Of course, I myself am not talking direct performance comparison, but merely end result. Of course the Opty is a bit slower...nothing new there Keith. And yes, a Futuremark bug.

@ 3.8ghz, the score is linked in my sig... care to click?

@Krog:

I'd be the resident buy-it-if-it-overclocks sort of guy...If I am not overclocking, I'm not having fun. Find the max, sell it, try again would be my hobby.
__________________
Reply With Quote