Thread: Went too far
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 13th May, 2008, 12:01 PM
MUff1N's Avatar
MUff1N MUff1N is offline
Member
 
Join Date: October 2007
Location: AZ/US
Posts: 548

Arrow

From what I've read all over the place, is the reason 1:1 is used is so that you can get your highest FSB clock speeds without the memory coming into play (for stability) because of the lower divider (frequency) used.

Now, IF I had a better CPU cooler and was going to go up to 3.6Ghz or higher I'd use a lower memory divider so that my memory wouldn't be so overclocked that it couldn't keep up anymore.
This is the reason I now have my memory at 4:5 (667) to keep it around 800Mhz which it is designed to run at and is stable, not to mention I found no benefit (added throughput) to overclocking my memory to 960Mhz. But I did notice much better throughput once my FSB went up & my games played much smoother.
That's my take on it anyways...Correct me if I'm wrong though guys! hehe

Btw, just so I could see I did a little experiment & I put my system back to default and played some of my games at their current "high" settings to visually see if there was any noticeable difference...
OMG!!! Jerky, lag and slow to catch up in places with stops and starts... What a diff without the added throughput!!!
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 3.46GHz / Zalman CPNS9700
Intel D975XBX2 Bad Axe 2 / FSB 1384
2x1GB Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400C4 (4-4-4-12) @ 866Mhz
Seagate Barracuda SATAII 2 x 320GB
EVGA NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320mb/320bit (648/1512/2052) 80.2Gbs using EVGA Precision 1.3.2
PhysX Enabled: Geforce v177.83 drivers / 3DMark06 12162
Acer X222W HD 22" LCD 1000:1 / 5ms
Thermaltake ToughPower 750w / 85% efficiency / SLI-Crossfire ready
XP PRO SP3 / Vista Ultimate SP1 (Both tweaked)

Last edited by MUff1N : 13th May, 2008 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote