Thread: Went too far
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 13th May, 2008, 12:43 PM
Gizmo's Avatar
Gizmo Gizmo is offline
Chief BBS Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Webb City, Mo
Posts: 13,717
Send a message via ICQ to Gizmo Send a message via AIM to Gizmo Send a message via MSN to Gizmo Send a message via Yahoo to Gizmo Send a message via Skype™ to Gizmo

Generally speaking, the AMD Athlon and AthlonXP cores perform better when running 1:1. I believe this is due to the way the internal caching is implemented. The upshot is that lower FSB running 1:1 (synchronous) can net you better memory performance than higher FSB running 5:4 (asynchronous) or something like that.

With the Intel P4 family, the caching mechanism works differently, and is less sensitive to memory latency, preferring higher FSB clocks. This is directly opposite the case with the AMD Athlon and AthlonXP cores.

Intels Core family CPUs have continued this trend from what I understand, and thus continue to perform better with high FSB, even at some sacrifice of memory latency. However, with the advent of the AMD Athlon64 and its integrated memory controller, the AMD architecture is no longer so sensitive to memory latency, and thus tends to now also favor higher bus speeds (though in this case it would HT clocks, rather than FSB clocks).

Hope that helps.
__________________
Avatar and sig graphic by Pitch. Subscribers!
Ask about a custom graphic or avatar today!
 
Later,
Gizmo
Thermal Diode Mod and Direct-Die Water Block
8-Cheetah 18GiB U-2 SCSI
MegaRAID Enterprise 1500/128MiB
Samsung SyncMaster 955DF
TTGI/Superflower TTS-520 PSU
 

 
AOA Team filesAOA Team wcgAOA Team fah
Reply With Quote