View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 5th April, 2009, 08:13 AM
ThunderRd's Avatar
ThunderRd ThunderRd is offline
Irreverent Query Chairman
 
Join Date: June 2007
Location: NYC native in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,241

Quote:
Originally Posted by dabaerman View Post
the 2653 on a quad is faster than the dual by 200ppd.
Ron
It's gotta be more than that, mate, or something is wrong...

If you are running one client only on the quad, that is. Should be double the dual, or thereabouts. My q6600 has been running a boatload of 2653's...about 7.30 minutes per step. They are the fastest and the best-yielding WUs by far. That's in addition to the two GPU clients in the same machine.

Try this as a test. Copy your work folder and queue.dat from the quad to the dual, and run both machines on the same WU; this way you have a direct comparison.

My comparable dual-cores all run Linux, so I can't attest to a direct comparison. They get different WUs on the a2 core.
__________________
#1: Tt Armor, ASUS Maximus Extreme, QX9650@4.1G, 8G Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2000, Corsair HX1050, H2O-Swiftech, Gigabyte GTX470/Arctic Accelero Xtreme Plus II, Intel 520 SSD, Kingston SSD, 2xRaptor 150G RAID0, Win 7 Pro 64
#2: Tt Shark, ASUS P5Q Pro Turbo, Q6600@3.8G, 4G HyperX-1600, Corsair HX850, CoolerMaster V10, 2xASUS 9600GT, 2xRaptor 74G RAID0, OCZ Vertex 4 SSD, Gentoo/siduction Linux [64-bit]
#3, #4: Opteron 170@2.75G nude, A8N-SLI Deluxe, Gentoo

AOA Folding @HomeOur sister site: www.gamersonlinux.com

Last edited by ThunderRd; 5th April, 2009 at 08:21 AM.
Reply With Quote