*chuckle* typical zdnet article, though. Not having to load up on anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-spyware and userspace-firewall software is seen as a bad thing.
I have strong mental image of a zdnet hack sitting their scratching his head trying to work out just /how/ to make Ubuntu seem bad, because that's what the editor wants.
(Just think, if more people started using Ubuntu, more people would find what they wanted for free, instead of trying to find the 180px wide article in the midst of their 1420px of adverts...)
It is by coffee alone I set my mind in motion...