| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| |||
| 7600GS, and on-die thermal diode Hi all. I currently have a 7600GS, overclocked quite nicely, and would like to go further. I am a little confused about a couple of things however. Let me illustrate with a screenie. ![]() In the system tray is the GPU temperature from ATITool - 66°. However, in RivaTuner, the temp is 57°. I noticed this difference after enabling the "on-die thermal diode" plugin in the RivaTuner setup. I also did some googling, and found that the on-die thermal diode would be the most accurate sensor for reporting temps. But this is confusing, since it reports lower temps than the "built in data provider". Could someone perhaps shed some light on this one? Many thanks. ![]()
__________________ |
| ||||
| In all honesty both are very inaccurate. Are these load temps, or idle temps by the way? because 60ish load is great for a 6600GT, while 60 idle isn't that good. I would definitely lean more towards the rivatuner temperature though.
__________________ Notebook: Dell XPS M1330 Running Fedora 8 Linux (Werewolf) Desktop: Gigabyte EX38-DS4 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (Yorkfield) @ 3.46Ghz 4GB DDR2-800 PNY Albatron 8800GT 512MB Corsair HX-620 PSU Running Fedora 8 Linux (Werewolf) Dual Dell 2407WFP ![]() Drivers, Games, Demos, Mods and Overclocking Tools At AOAFiles |
| ||||
| In all likelyhood, the Rivatuner reading is a direct diode reading, whereas the ATITool reading is a 'calibrated' reading, meaning that there is some offset or scaling applied to it to account for variations (both real and imagined) from unit to unit. I'm with Dsio, I'd tend to trust the Rivatuner reading more, but they are both going to be suspect. Without some method of calibration, you aren't going to get closer than about +/- 5 degrees of the actual temperature.
__________________ Avatar and sig graphic by Pitch. Subscribers! Ask about a custom graphic or avatar today! Gizmo Thermal Diode Mod and Direct-Die Water Block 8-Cheetah 18GiB U-2 SCSI MegaRAID Enterprise 1500/128MiB Samsung SyncMaster 955DF TTGI/Superflower TTS-520 PSU ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| |||
| Alright, cool. I thought the thermal diode would be more accurate, but was just confused since it reported temps lower than the other. That's good - means I can o/c the core a fair bit more. ![]() Those are load temps. It idles at around 30°C. ![]() Hmm. Considering that both of these are inaccurate, what do you guys think would be a safe maximum temp, according to the Rivatuner thermal diode reading? Thanks.
__________________ |
| ||||
| Till it artefacts
__________________ Dell Inspiron 6000 1.73GHz Intel "Sonoma" 1GB DDR2 533 ATI X300 Join our F@H team today.. http://www.team45.info/ Are you a subscriber? No? well then, why not.... Subscribe to AOA for a better experience and faster downloads! How to unlock and overclock your Nvidia 6800 BIOS Volt-mod your 7800gt |
| |||
| Quote:
![]() Thanks for the help all. ![]()
__________________ |
| |||
| Quote:
![]() 3dMark is too big for me to d/l on 56k. But you can check this review for 3dmark scores of a 7600GS with very similar speeds. At stock, mine was 450/800. After o/c, it is 750/900. So the o/c speed is very close to the 7600GS in that review. ![]()
__________________ |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NF7-S CPU Thermal Diode Mod, Version 2.0 | Gizmo | AMD Motherboards & CPUs | 56 | 14th October, 2006 01:34 AM |
| 8RDA3+ CPU Thermal Diode Mod | Per Hansson | Cooling & Temperature Monitoring | 1 | 20th October, 2004 08:02 AM |
| NF7-S CPU Thermal Diode Mod, Version 2.0 | Gizmo | AOA FAQ | 4 | 13th June, 2004 09:52 AM |
| NF7-S CPU Thermal Diode Mod | Gizmo | AMD Motherboards & CPUs | 14 | 8th June, 2004 10:20 PM |
| Where's the thermal diode? | Wetling | EPoX MotherBoards | 13 | 23rd February, 2003 02:29 PM |