| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Data Security Viruses, Firewalls and Safe computing |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| ||||
| Comcast P2P blocking spurs calls for Net Neutrality Written by Daniel Saturday, 20 October 2007 ISP skulduggery The Inquirer By Egan Orion: Friday, 19 October 2007, 10:58 PM IN LESS THAN A DAY, an Associated Press (AP) story that Comcast blocks its customers Peer-to-Peer (P2P) connections has pinged around the Internet like a pinball, ringing bells at MSNBC and other AP subscribers and provoking hisses and catcalls at Slashdot as well as more boos and calls to action at Salon and even the lefty political activists' bog Daily Kos.... Front Page
__________________ "Though all men live in ignorance before mystery, they need not live in darkness... Justice is foundation and ETERNAL." DKE "All that we do is touched by Ocean Yet we remain on the shore of what we know." Richard Wilbur ![]() Subscribers! Ask Pitch about a Custom Sig Graphic |
| ||||
| From Slashdot: Slashdot | Comcast May Face Lawsuits Over BitTorrent Filtering Comcast may face legal action over what they're doing. The whole 'Bittorrent is for pirates' argument is garbage, BT is not a piracy tool, its a p2p content distribution tool, and contrary to popular belief, P2P sharing IS NOT ILLEGAL. The bulk of Linux distros are distributed primarily by Bitorrent, and the same goes for any community based organisation that needs to distribute data. When I was looking for the UT3 server, the method that EPIC chose to distribute it was Bittorrent. 10 Million World Of Warcraft players get all of their game patches via Bittorrent, as Blizzard knows that the logistics of getting a 600MB patch to a few million people in a matter of hours is beyond anything they could handle if it had to be grabbed directly from their servers. ISPs are getting too big for their boots at the moment, and are attacking customers' rights in order to increase their profits. Right now I have an issue with local Australian ISPs in that it is becomming common practice to block external access on port 25, and limit the number of emails from one address to 100 per day. Previously, if a company had a hosting provider in the USA for example, on the same type of servers that AOA is run out of, they could set up outlook or whatever mail client they use, to use that server as their outgoing mail server, and have greater freedom in that sense. However, doing this means that all of the client's outgoing data has to be sent over to the USA. Now the ISPs believe that 80-95% of all client mail is Australia to Australia, which means that if they get the mail, they can handle it locally at no cost, so to force clients to do this, they block Port 25 externally. This is a pain in the arse, as it means clients have to have one mail server (their pop server) set to one thing, and another mail server (their smtp server) set to another thing. It gets worse though. Because the three largest ISPs in Australia have now instituted a 100 message per day hard limit on email accounts. What this means, is that if a person sends more than 100 messages in one day, that person's mail account is shut down, not just for the day, but for a ONE WEEK 'cooling off period'. Business clients can OFTEN need to send more than 100 messages in a day, both for small business mailouts, and for customer interaction, and support. However, this is a hard limit, that is automatically implemented, and if you call the ISP AFTER your account has been locked for a week, you are SOL because its an automated process that can't be modified. The justification of this bull**** is that they consider it a method of preventing SPAM. You see, spam filtering, is a major issue, and filtering is a huge load on mailservers, so rather than actually spending money on implementing filtering, ISPs are now simply stopping people sending large numbers of emails BLINDLY. GG dickheads.
__________________ Notebook: Dell XPS M1330 Running Fedora 8 Linux (Werewolf) Desktop: Gigabyte EX38-DS4 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (Yorkfield) @ 3.46Ghz 4GB DDR2-800 PNY Albatron 8800GT 512MB Corsair HX-620 PSU Running Fedora 8 Linux (Werewolf) Dual Dell 2407WFP ![]() Drivers, Games, Demos, Mods and Overclocking Tools At AOAFiles |
| ||||
| I'm sure the people (Orgs.) dsio mentions will be able to purchase exceptions Dan.":O} Actually it's the Desktop users (Me) Comcast is screwing with rather than the more expensive Business version, but that might bear looking into as well...When did everyone turn into such rats asses!?
__________________ "Though all men live in ignorance before mystery, they need not live in darkness... Justice is foundation and ETERNAL." DKE "All that we do is touched by Ocean Yet we remain on the shore of what we know." Richard Wilbur ![]() Subscribers! Ask Pitch about a Custom Sig Graphic |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comcast blocks some Internet traffic | Daniel ~ | Data Security | 5 | 20th October, 2007 07:44 AM |
| What do Comcast banwidth caps mean? | Daniel ~ | Random Nonsense! | 7 | 20th September, 2007 03:32 PM |
| Comcast demos rapid 150Mbps internet | danrok | Mobile Devices and Networking | 9 | 12th May, 2007 02:08 AM |
| Comcast fined $12k for being too slow | danrok | Random Nonsense! | 1 | 11th February, 2007 08:53 PM |
| Help! Firewall blocking FAH | Allan | Samuknow's AOA FOLDING@HOME Team | 3 | 13th October, 2003 01:40 PM |