| |||
| http://home.comcast.net/~teckzilla/epox.PNG hi, What i did is bend the two capacitors back just a little to fit my booster in the memory slot to allow dual channel crazy but worth it to me The most volt i put to the memory is 3.9volts ,24/7 use i have it at 3.4volts I got a bad batch of bh-5 there not stable over 250 even when i had my Dfi board, Im sure if you have a good set of bh-5 you can hit 250 easy PS.ocz booster is very picky about PSU my brand new Enermax460 doesnt work with it but my Antec350 works fine
__________________ |
| ||||
| @ Runnel : Are all those results you're posting the Everest's read test results or something else? I'm asking, because you've only mentioned the benchmark once - just in case ... ![]() I wrote they depend on the multi - try to do the write test as well - as far as I know the write results increase with the multi, but I'm not sure about that. In my case they've increased much more than the read ones while using Merlin's bios, in comparison to the stock bios. Am I wrong or you were able to run your mem in 2x512MB dual channel using the non-modded bios with CPC On? If you were indeed, than I think you should try out Merlin's CPC On thingy. As to daily use I run at 11x200 V-core 1.50v, 2x512MB dual channel 2-3-3-11 - higher OCing is just for fun! Whatever you choose I think you will not notice any serious difference. ![]() @ Naibot : It's the nForce2 itself, that's holding back your FSB. Dual channel is the first problem and 2x512MB of memory is the second and even more serious one. If you can push your system up to stable FSB235 with 2x512MB in dual channel mode, than you should be glad with it. ![]() Try the CPC Off bios, but don't count on any noticeable performance increase unless you reach much higher FSB : http://www.insanetek.com/index.php?page=cpcnf2 Mark that elzhi has 2x256MB configuration, so he must have less problems with high FSB speeds. @ mrapples : I'm almost sure it's your cpu - try to give him more voltage or simply get a better one. @ all : This thread has been really getting more and more interesting
__________________ AMD AXP-M 11x220 1.675v| Epox 8RDA3+ PRO 1.4| Thermalright SLK900U /Y.S.Tech 92mm| 2x512MB Mushkin PC3200 L.II V2| Sapphire Radeon 9800 PRO@XT| S.B. Live 5.1| Maxtor 120GB| Seagate 80GB| Teac CD-W540E| Asus DVD| BeQuiet Blackline 450W| Chieftec BX| Iiyama HM704UTc| |
| |||
| @ MietMaN thanks for replying so quickly. answering your questions: - yes, all are Everest's read test results. - write-test with multi 9,5 and 11 I can do tonight - with the September stock-bios. using Merlin's bios again I'll wait for the hopefully fixed standby. - yes: 2 x 512 MB MDT DS dualchannel (put in the sockets of the same color). yes: using the non-modded bios. - "with CPC On?" Sorry, where is the switch? In "Advanced Chipset Features" I have "Memory Auto Precharge" 'enable'. "CPU Interface" I have 'optimal'. I found no difference to 'aggressiv'. So where is "CPC On"? - yes, next time I will try out 'Merlin's CPC On thingy'. (I heard that this is only for expensive memory, therefore I first tried the CPC Off version.) Yeah the nice thing about this nForce boards is the possibility to adapt the fsb automatically. In daily life I switch with speedfan between fsb 133 and 233 (idle / load). multi 9.5, Vcore 1.47 v. 80 mm-cpu fan: 1200 rpm; 3 x 80 mm case fans, 2 @ 1050 rpm, one @ 1200 rpm. cpu-temp: 36° and almost no noise. beautiful! The only pitty about the 8RDA6+ Pro is the fact that the board is not supporting the automatic fan speed control by speedfan.
__________________ |
| ||||
| There is no switch in the bios user interface to enable it. The only way to change the cpc setting is by flashing to the corresponding Merlin bios. I do notice a difference by setting the cpu interface to agressive but i heard it makes the most difference when you're using tCAS 2.
__________________ Asus Maximus Formula (X38) Intel Q6600 3720Mhz TT Mozart Tx 2x WD Raptors 74gb R0 2x Maxtor 300gb Asus Geforce EN8800GT Windoors XP Pro sp2 Download here OcBible 1.55 & Guidemania v1.21 |
| ||||
| Quote:
http://www.insanetek.com/index.php?page=cpcnf2 The CPU interface does seem to afflict system performance in my case (again, 3D applications and benchmarks) but less than with Abit NF7 I've had. On my long dead Epox 8RDA3+ rev.2.1 it also allowed me to reach higher FSB when switched to 'Optimal', but again with performance loss. The 'Optimal' setting might have allowed you to do FSB233 with 2x512MB dual channel - I personally prefer lower FSB and the 'Aggressive' setting. Quote:
![]() @ mrapples : Well, it depends also on the week of production and on individual CPU you have - e.g. for AMD XP-M 2500+ IQYHA 0408 was one of the best weeks (the 8th week of 2004), but there was another one I can't recall, that was simply a tragedy - 2.4GHz with voltages about 1.9v. Your 12v line seems to be fine with 22A, providing the PSU isn't one of those Codegen (Code****) or Megabyte ones. ![]()
__________________ AMD AXP-M 11x220 1.675v| Epox 8RDA3+ PRO 1.4| Thermalright SLK900U /Y.S.Tech 92mm| 2x512MB Mushkin PC3200 L.II V2| Sapphire Radeon 9800 PRO@XT| S.B. Live 5.1| Maxtor 120GB| Seagate 80GB| Teac CD-W540E| Asus DVD| BeQuiet Blackline 450W| Chieftec BX| Iiyama HM704UTc| |
| |||
| So, now I tested the memory performance til the end, my friend. To compare with multi 9.5 (@ 1.475 V) with multi 11 (@ 1,675 V Vcore), the other settings I didn't touch (2,5/4/4/10 - optimal) (Epox-September Bios ((sorry for wasting so much space with the stock bios in Merlin's thread)). To make it more easy to compare I each time start with the cpu-speed, followed by multi and fsb. EverestHome: read (MB/s)/write (MB/s)/delay (ns) 1580 MHz: 9.5 x 166: 2382/905/126,3 (+21%/+14%) 11 x 143: 1954/792/146,3 1710 MHz: 9.5 x 180: 2577/977/117.2 11 x 156: 2128/866/133,6 1900 MHz: 9.5 x 200: 2864/1087/105,2 (+21%/+14%) 11 x 173: 2356/ 957/120,8 1995 MHz: 9.5 x 210: 3007/1144/100,8 11 x 181: 2459/1006/115 2086 MHz: 9.5 x 220: 3136/1196/ 95,7 11 x 190: 2593/1053/109,7 2181 MHz: 9.5 x 230: 3285/1250/ 91,6 (+21%/+14%) 11 x 198: 2707/1095/105,2 2287 MHz: 9.5 x 240: 3450/1310/ 87,5 11 x 208: 2843/1147/100,2 2327 MHz: 9.5 x 245: 3515/BSOD (@ 1,475 V) 11 x 212: 2886/1166/98,6 2416 MHz: 11 x 220: 2995/1216/95 2504 MHz: 11 x 228: 3102/1261/91,7 2525 MHz: 11 x 230: 3130/1274/91,1 ... 9.5 x 220= 2080 MHz: read 3136 ... for the same write-performance: 9.5 x 235 = 2234 MHz: write: 1283 MB/s. Conclusion: The memory read/write performance with multi 9.5 is about 21%/14% better compared to multi 11. What does that tell us?
__________________ |
| ||||
| Quote:
Runnel, i find this very strange. I'll test it out right now. btw, are you quoting the doors, my friend? ![]() edit: I normally run at 12x12.5 @ 2.5-3-3-11, now i changed the multiplier to 9.5, I had to do that in the bios, changing multipliers on the fly makes my system hang and resets my bios o_O. Here are my results: 12x 3297 int 3028 float 9.5x 3247 int 2990 float I'd say those are rather normal results when you lower your multiplier. Of course i have the cpc1 bios. What happens when you try single channel and/or one stick of memory? What you're experiencing is not normal. Perhaps someone with a cpc2 bios could test the same?
__________________ Asus Maximus Formula (X38) Intel Q6600 3720Mhz TT Mozart Tx 2x WD Raptors 74gb R0 2x Maxtor 300gb Asus Geforce EN8800GT Windoors XP Pro sp2 Download here OcBible 1.55 & Guidemania v1.21 Last edited by Wolf2000me : 2nd February, 2005 at 12:38 PM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
But I think the conclusion is somehow false : you can't say your memory performance with 9.5x multi is 21%/14% better than with multi x11. Why? Just because you've done all the tests at different FSB to keep the CPU at the same speed, but not the memory, which was the thing you tested. CPU FSB = Memory FSB, unless you run in asymetric mode (makes no sense on nFroce2). The right conclusion in my opinion is, that : stock Epox September bios is simply optimized for lower multipliers (probably 9-10x). Your results with 11x230 match those of 9.5x220 - you used the same timings, so here is the difference and here you can find the right %%%%%% While testing the influence of the multiplier on memory performance the FSB shlould remain the same - this makes the theoretical maximal memory bandwidth the same for all possible multis. Quote:
D26 Manta Rays XT by TicTac : http://forum.hslab.pl/viewtopic.php?...=asc&start=405 (3rd post on the page, Mavers, seems to be some problems with his server, plz be patient) D26 TaiPan (one of them, there've been many ) by Merlinhttp://forum.hslab.pl/viewtopic.php?...=asc&start=390 (4th post, Mavers, as above - takes time) D26 Discovery by Merlin and D26 Black MantaRay by TicTac http://forum.hslab.pl/viewtopic.php?...=asc&start=375 (Mavers as usual - the first post and then another one down the page) Interesting, isn't it? ![]() @ Wolf2000me : have a look at those tests above. You're running the Merlin's bios now, so I see it is well optimized for many multis - 9.5x and 11x are almost identical. Good to know - I'm gonna tell Merlin - he should be happy with this fact. ![]() This is what all the modders have been trying to achieve - similar bandwidth for a wide selection of multis. Usually, the bandwidth dropps while lowering multis, but I see that Epox has prepared something special for us ![]() Btw. Am I writting a compendium or something? I'll try do save those tests above to my HDD an upload them on my server - it takes ages untli they've loaded.
__________________ AMD AXP-M 11x220 1.675v| Epox 8RDA3+ PRO 1.4| Thermalright SLK900U /Y.S.Tech 92mm| 2x512MB Mushkin PC3200 L.II V2| Sapphire Radeon 9800 PRO@XT| S.B. Live 5.1| Maxtor 120GB| Seagate 80GB| Teac CD-W540E| Asus DVD| BeQuiet Blackline 450W| Chieftec BX| Iiyama HM704UTc| Last edited by MietmaN : 2nd February, 2005 at 06:24 PM. |
| ||||
| Different bioses, different multipliers, different memory performance by mavers - hslab.pl D26 Black Mantaray by TicTac D26 MantaRays XT by TicTac D26 Discovery by Merlin D26 TaiPan by Merlin
__________________ AMD AXP-M 11x220 1.675v| Epox 8RDA3+ PRO 1.4| Thermalright SLK900U /Y.S.Tech 92mm| 2x512MB Mushkin PC3200 L.II V2| Sapphire Radeon 9800 PRO@XT| S.B. Live 5.1| Maxtor 120GB| Seagate 80GB| Teac CD-W540E| Asus DVD| BeQuiet Blackline 450W| Chieftec BX| Iiyama HM704UTc| Last edited by MietmaN : 2nd February, 2005 at 04:44 PM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() I didn't know of all this until now. Thanks MietmaN If there's anything you want me to test, i'll gladly make some time for you ![]() Quote:
![]() edit: I'm going to look for some winbond UTT or BH-5 memory and buy me a booster. It'll likely be on Twinmos speedpremium memory in the near future. So perhaps no hassle with P/N numbers and stuff like that ![]()
__________________ Asus Maximus Formula (X38) Intel Q6600 3720Mhz TT Mozart Tx 2x WD Raptors 74gb R0 2x Maxtor 300gb Asus Geforce EN8800GT Windoors XP Pro sp2 Download here OcBible 1.55 & Guidemania v1.21 |
| ||||
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ AMD AXP-M 11x220 1.675v| Epox 8RDA3+ PRO 1.4| Thermalright SLK900U /Y.S.Tech 92mm| 2x512MB Mushkin PC3200 L.II V2| Sapphire Radeon 9800 PRO@XT| S.B. Live 5.1| Maxtor 120GB| Seagate 80GB| Teac CD-W540E| Asus DVD| BeQuiet Blackline 450W| Chieftec BX| Iiyama HM704UTc| |
| |||
| new guy here... I have a 8RDA6+Pro with a Mobile 2600 and 2x512 Mushkin PC3200...... because of the memory I decided to try Melin's T2 version of th Bios and could not be happier. I do have a minor glitch that I have seen posted. Cold Boot seem to require that I switch the PSU off, push the front panel power switch a few time to fully discharge the PSU, turn the PSU back on and hold the keyboard 'Insert' key down while powering up.... then all is well, but it won't cold boot normally. It will reboot fine, say you have just installed the latest driver for something and need to re-boot to activate it. It will reboot normally for me. I am running at 12x200 right now, but I need to get a replacement monitor as its on the blink and I can't "Lend' my A64's monitor to that system all the time! My first EPoX and now that I have the Monitor woes sorted, I really like it.
__________________ Rig 1 MSI K9A2 Platinum, 6400+, 4 gig PC6400, 3870; and then MSI K9A2 CF, 5000+; Abit Fatal1ty AN8, Opteron 185; ASRock 939Dual VSTA, 4400+; EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra, 148 Opteron; Abit KN9 SLI, 5000+;Abit UL8, 3800+; Gigabyte 754 3200+; ASUS A8N-VM CSM, 3500+, ASRock Dual Sata-2, 3200+, Abit NF7-S; DFI NFII; EPoX 8RDA6+Pro. |
| |||
| I saw that a problem in the Merlin's bios is that S3 and hiberanation are broken .. Because I really need this functions (pratically I never shutdown windows, I only use suspend to disk and I don't want to abandon this way) I want to ask to Merlin if in the next 'release' he can check if this functions continues working.. By the way thanks for the great work you're doing, Merlin!!
__________________ Epox 8RDA6+ 1.2 - 512 Mb Twinmos PC3200 BH-5 + 512 Mb Corsair 3200C2 in DC 2-2-2-11 - XP-M 2600+ @ 200x12,5 MHz - Lunasio OC3000 - Fiat Ritmo Rad |