|
General Hardware Discussion Hard drives, CD, DVD Monitors, All hardware questions not better served by our other Topics |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| |||
Want some northwood results? hi. I'd like to keep anonymous but I recently found myself in a situation where I could benchmark the new 0.13 micron Pentium 4 (0.13). I am keeping anonymous becuase this information is not supposed to be spoken about until the 12th of january. But I'm taking this risk becuase I know people want to hear it. I compared this 2.2gig chip to an XP 2000+ (1.66ghz). XP system: Asus A7V266-E (kt266a chipset) 256 megs of 133 DDR memory Gefroce 3 Ti 500 Windows XP The same system was used for the pentium 4 bar the chip and motherboard. It's an intel motherboard. I'm not gonna try and analyse these benchmarks too much - you can do that yourself but I am slightly dissapointed considering the 533mhz clock speed difference. the Benchmarks I did where sysmark 2001, 3dmark, q3bench and Sisoft Sandra.. enjoy!
__________________ |
| |||
Pentium 4 2.2gig SysMark 2001 Internet Content Creation 229 Office Productivity 143 3dmark 2001 3dmarks: 8005 --------------------- Q3Bench RESULTS --------------------- FILE: q3b_010202_090333.txt START TIME: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 09:03:33 AM COMMENT: P4 BENCHMARK SETUP: ---------------- DEMO: DEMO001 CFG FILES RUN: Normal High Maximum RESOLUTIONS RUN: 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200 NUMBER OF RUNS: 3 times. NORMAL Configuration File Settings: (640x480) 259.1, 258.7, 259.0, AVERAGE FPS: 258.93 (800x600) 251.0, 251.7, 251.4, AVERAGE FPS: 251.37 (1024x768) 220.8, 222.9, 222.9, AVERAGE FPS: 222.20 (1280x1024) 159.9, 159.9, 159.9, AVERAGE FPS: 159.90 (1600x1200) 113.7, 113.7, 113.7, AVERAGE FPS: 113.70 HIGH Configuration File Settings: (640x480) 252.4, 252.2, 252.4, AVERAGE FPS: 252.33 (800x600) 243.7, 243.5, 243.8, AVERAGE FPS: 243.67 (1024x768) 211.1, 211.1, 211.1, AVERAGE FPS: 211.10 (1280x1024) 154.3, 154.3, 154.4, AVERAGE FPS: 154.33 (1600x1200) 110.6, 110.6, 110.5, AVERAGE FPS: 110.57 MAX Configuration File Settings: (640x480) 246.5, 246.5, 246.6, AVERAGE FPS: 246.53 (800x600) 237.5, 237.7, 237.7, AVERAGE FPS: 237.63 (1024x768) 207.2, 207.2, 207.2, AVERAGE FPS: 207.20 (1280x1024) 151.9, 152.0, 152.0, AVERAGE FPS: 151.97 (1600x1200) 109.3, 109.3, 109.3, AVERAGE FPS: 109.30 Sisoft Sandra CPU: Dhrystone ALU 4273 MIPS Whetstone FPU/SSE2 1145/2682 Multimedia: Integer SSE2 8714 it/s Floating-Point SSE2 10801 it/s Memory Int ALU/RAM Bandwidth 950 mb/s Float FPU/RAM Bandwidth 994 MB/s
__________________ |
| |||
SysMark 2001 Internet Content Creation 191 Office Productivity 154 3dmark 2001 8112 3dmarks --------------------- Q3Bench RESULTS --------------------- FILE: q3b_010102_051845.txt START TIME: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 05:18:45 AM COMMENT: Xp 2000 BENCHMARK SETUP: ---------------- DEMO: DEMO001 CFG FILES RUN: Normal High Maximum RESOLUTIONS RUN: 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200 NUMBER OF RUNS: 3 times. NORMAL Configuration File Settings: (640x480) 236.3, 236.5, 236.3, AVERAGE FPS: 236.37 (800x600) 230.7, 231.3, 231.2, AVERAGE FPS: 231.07 (1024x768) 210.9, 210.9, 210.9, AVERAGE FPS: 210.90 (1280x1024) 159.1, 159.1, 159.2, AVERAGE FPS: 159.13 (1600x1200) 113.5, 113.5, 113.6, AVERAGE FPS: 113.53 HIGH Configuration File Settings: (640x480) 231.5, 231.4, 231.5, AVERAGE FPS: 231.47 (800x600) 225.6, 225.6, 225.8, AVERAGE FPS: 225.67 (1024x768) 201.0, 200.9, 201.0, AVERAGE FPS: 200.97 (1280x1024) 151.3, 151.2, 151.3, AVERAGE FPS: 151.27 (1600x1200) 110.3, 110.3, 110.3, AVERAGE FPS: 110.30 MAX Configuration File Settings: (640x480) 226.0, 226.0, 226.1, AVERAGE FPS: 226.03 (800x600) 220.2, 220.3, 220.5, AVERAGE FPS: 220.33 (1024x768) 197.1, 197.0, 197.0, AVERAGE FPS: 197.03 (1280x1024) 149.0, 149.0, 148.9, AVERAGE FPS: 148.97 (1600x1200) 109.1, 109.1, 109.1, AVERAGE FPS: 109.10 Sisoft Sandra: CPU: Dhrystone ALU 4673 MIPS Whetstone FPU 2336 MFLOPS Multimedia: Integer SSE 9338 it/s Floating-Point SSE 10769 it/s Memory: Int ALU/RAM Bandwidth 765 MB/s Float FPU/RAM Bandwidth 806 MB/s
__________________ |
| ||||
Just a thought. Cast your minds back to the Slot A athlon. There was a 0.25 and a 0.18 micron version of say for instance the 650 avaialble (or some microns like that) and they ran aat the same speed except you could clock the 0.18 higher. could be the move to 0.13 does little more than enable more clocking. Just a thought.
__________________ |
| ||||
annonymous? i could make a guess ![]() no..... sorry just wish i had an XP2000+ tho! waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa hey wait........... i could overclock mine to that....... especially with my new cooling system im putting togeather.
__________________ Dual XP1600+ AGOIA "Y" @ 1875mhz WATERCOOLED 33C LOAD Undergoing overhaul. Hard Locking to 13.5X multiplier for theoretical clockrate of 1944mhz 144mhz FSB 1X Duron 1.3 AHCLA "9" @ 1430mhz 1X Celeron 1000mhz 1X Pentium3 450 DECEASED Folding Under AOA-UK for team 45! ![]() "Mothers should love their babies, because then they grow up, everyone might hate them." |
| |||
The 2Ghz Northwood will debut at $420, but drop to $364 by January 27th. The Athlon XP 2000+ is currently debuting in Japan at about $380 US. The die shrink may not have done much for the Athlon but the Athlon wasn't initially designed solely for the smaller process like the P4 was. The P4 was released early on the larger process and they had to supersize the chip in order to do so, even with a huge chip that cut into profit margins they still had to cut out part of their design to make it work with sacrificed performance so that they could get higher mhz earlier. No one expected the P4 to be mainstream until it came out in the 0.13 micron process when the whole architectural design could be put on and it would be able to be sold cheaper, but it with a ramped up marketing effort it became mainstream earlier than expected. With double the cache, architectural improvements like the chip was supposed to originally have, smaller die size, copper connectors like the Athlon has had for over a year, and less voltage required you guys are thinking too much in the past. The Northwood will be the chip to set the P4 line straight, like it was supposed to be. Then just wait till the FSB gets 1/3 faster here in couple months, paired with faster memory there will be little from AMD to compete with until the Hammer line gets out. Then shortly afterwards the P4 will be going 0.09 micron paired with DDR2+.
__________________ |
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ |
| |||
Is the northwood just in 478 format or 423.Which one will prevail?I haven't upgraded yet.Just trying to make my equipment as long as possible before I get rid of old and bring in the new. ![]()
__________________ |
| ||||
Quote:
QWhen the p4 first came out all we had was promises about software optimzations and that never came through. So i'm not holding my breath for promises.
__________________ |
| |||
Yes I think you're right but I will ask a Higher Authority.(my neighbour is a famous[no I can't tell you] astrolisist ,he says he reads stars and all that good stuff.I'll ask him what's in the stars for the northwood. ![]()
__________________ |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P4 Northwood 1.8A Overclocking. | mcg | Hardware Hacking | 6 | 16th August, 2004 12:49 PM |
P4 2.4B Northwood | cadaveca | Intel Motherboards & CPUs | 6 | 27th May, 2004 02:46 AM |
Prescott 2.8Ghz Vs 2.8Ghz Northwood Results | chiyau | Intel Motherboards & CPUs | 9 | 14th February, 2004 06:16 AM |
8RDA+, XP2400+, OC results...with similar system, whats your results? | Powerhouse | EPoX MotherBoards | 7 | 6th February, 2003 01:37 AM |
Motherboard for a Northwood and pc 133 | Kaiser_Sose | Intel Motherboards & CPUs | 11 | 13th March, 2002 06:09 PM |