| ||||
The 4200 should be faster, but the difference would be minimal and depend on how high the 4200 ocs. If it cant reach say 275/275 then there is a good chance that the 8500 could be faster after ocing. I would use the 4200 in your main gaming rig. As for the 275/275 8500 those are getting very rare, congrats of finding a great card.
__________________ Biostar TForce550 A64 X2 3600+ (65nm)@2.9 (1.4V) TR Ultra 90 2GB Crucial Ballistix 6400@ DDR2 1000 C5 Geforce 7900GS 2x160gig hdd with WinXP, Vista, and Ubuntu member of FOLDING@HOME team 32 Latitude D620 with XP, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon |
| ||||
Quote:
I actually got the 8500 from Yodums ![]()
__________________ "Get busy living or get busy dying, Thats god damn right." -Red |
| ||||
Oh ok. I was just wondering about the oc because I know that a stock 4200 is about 10-15% faster than the 8500, but the stock 64mb 4200 comes clocked at 250/500 mhz and yours is clocked at 250/450. So you have the 128mb version? The performance should be very close with the 4200 being a bit faster.
__________________ Biostar TForce550 A64 X2 3600+ (65nm)@2.9 (1.4V) TR Ultra 90 2GB Crucial Ballistix 6400@ DDR2 1000 C5 Geforce 7900GS 2x160gig hdd with WinXP, Vista, and Ubuntu member of FOLDING@HOME team 32 Latitude D620 with XP, Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
| |