| |||
Are later spec PCIexpress video cards backwards compatible? I'm in the process of putting together a new machine and my preferred motherboard is PCIExpress 2.0 whereas I see there are video boards out there spec'd at 2.1 and 3.0. My expectation is that a spec mismatch would result in the video board performing at less than full capability, but I wouldn't expect it to not work at all -- just fallback to the support capability of the motherboard spec. Can anyone tell me the reality? Thanks ![]()
__________________ FIC VA-503+ K6-III+/450@550 256MB PC133Turbo Abit Rocket 100 WinXPsp2/Win98SE ![]() |
| |||
Excellent! I read a post where a guy was saying his new video card won't work because its spec is ahead of his board, and so he was going to set it aside for a future mobo upgrade. Didn't make much sense to me, so I thought I'd ask.
__________________ FIC VA-503+ K6-III+/450@550 256MB PC133Turbo Abit Rocket 100 WinXPsp2/Win98SE ![]() |
| ||||
In looking at the spec more carefully, it IS possible that a 3.0 card might not be backwards compatible to a previous PCIe slot. This is because the 3.0 spec changed the encoding scheme from 8b/10b (which has a 20% signaling overhead) to 128b/130b (which has a 1.54% signaling overhead). Moreover in addition to the new encoding scheme, the data are scrambled in a very specific way requiring a descrambler at the other end. This allows the 3.0 card to achieve a throughput equivalent of 10 Gb/s per lane (as compared to PCIe 2.0), while only signaling at an actual rate of 8 Gb/s. Because of this, the card may elect not to support slower speeds. IMO, this is rather stupid, since it's pretty well documented that current video cards don't even hit the full bandwidth of 16x slots at PCIe 2.0 speeds (much less 3.0) but it DOES make the silicon and drivers less complex. Last edited by Gizmo; 23rd May, 2013 at 01:55 AM. |
| |||
Interesting, thanks for looking at that! My guess was the marketeers would require backwards compatibility in order to ensure sales. Without it, they'd just be begging for a boatload of returns. I actually looked for a later PCI-e spec motherboard for my just completed AMD build, but found nothing affordable more recent than 2.0. It appears AMD 3.0's just started showing up at the upper end in the last few months. Guess that's better than being bundled into the Steamroller release ![]() Still, as you pointed out, unless you demand bleeding edge performance, seems like 2.0 is just fine.
__________________ FIC VA-503+ K6-III+/450@550 256MB PC133Turbo Abit Rocket 100 WinXPsp2/Win98SE ![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video game critics' bandwagon rolls backwards | danrok | GAMES! OH YEAH! | 6 | 18th November, 2006 05:35 PM |
Agp 8x card backwards compatible? | MONKEYMAN | Graphics and Sound cards; Speakers and other Peripherals | 16 | 18th November, 2005 11:16 PM |
PCI video Cards | captaincurran | Graphics and Sound cards; Speakers and other Peripherals | 1 | 15th September, 2005 11:53 AM |
8rda+ and Video Cards | ckbisek | EPoX MotherBoards | 7 | 2nd April, 2003 10:10 PM |