| |||
For overclocking, it's not the software that needs to be stable, it's the hardware ![]() NT, 2000, XP and 2003 are all based on the same kernel, so are all pretty similar. However, Server 2003 dedicates more memory to things like network connection tables and the like, so requires more memory to acheive the same level of performance.
__________________ Any views, thoughts and opinions are entirely my own. They don't necessarily represent those of my employer (BlackBerry). |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
| |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
windows server 2003 enterprise edition FTP | karbon86 | OS, Software, Firmware, and BIOS | 2 | 28th October, 2004 10:29 PM |
windows server 2003 | barneygumble742 | OS, Software, Firmware, and BIOS | 1 | 16th August, 2004 04:49 AM |
folding on server 2003 | alexkerhead | ThunderRd's AOA FOLDING@HOME Team | 4 | 8th August, 2004 04:53 AM |
8k5A3+ USB2.0 + Windows Server 2003 | pgudge | EPoX MotherBoards | 0 | 2nd July, 2003 05:43 PM |
help with inline file server and messagimg server. | r0l0e | Mobile Devices and Networking | 24 | 22nd July, 2002 01:52 AM |