23rd August, 2003, 01:54 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Xp or Server 2003 and overclocking Hi do you know which OS (xp or servwer 2003) is more stable for oveclocking?
__________________ Athlon 1700+@2600+/WC/Abit Kd7-e/Prolink Gf 4 ti 4200/Wdc 800JB/512 MB Pc2700/Chieftec 360W/Win XP+SP1      |
|
23rd August, 2003, 03:56 PM
| |||
| |||
| For overclocking, it's not the software that needs to be stable, it's the hardware  NT, 2000, XP and 2003 are all based on the same kernel, so are all pretty similar. However, Server 2003 dedicates more memory to things like network connection tables and the like, so requires more memory to acheive the same level of performance.
__________________ Any views, thoughts and opinions are entirely my own. They don't necessarily represent those of my employer (BlackBerry). |
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| windows server 2003 enterprise edition FTP | karbon86 | OS, Software, Firmware, and BIOS | 2 | 28th October, 2004 10:29 PM |
| windows server 2003 | barneygumble742 | OS, Software, Firmware, and BIOS | 1 | 16th August, 2004 04:49 AM |
| folding on server 2003 | alexkerhead | ThunderRd's AOA FOLDING@HOME Team | 4 | 8th August, 2004 04:53 AM |
| 8k5A3+ USB2.0 + Windows Server 2003 | pgudge | EPoX MotherBoards | 0 | 2nd July, 2003 05:43 PM |
| help with inline file server and messagimg server. | r0l0e | Mobile Devices and Networking | 24 | 22nd July, 2002 01:52 AM |
