| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| ||||
| I'm at a loss here. I can't wait to see the answer for this one.
__________________ "FEAR NOT" Isaiah 41:10 eVga 680i SLI 122-CK-NF68-A1 E6400 @ 3.3 @ 1.25V 2 x 8800 GTS SLI 3 x 21" Sony Trinitron Tuniq 3 modified case. PSU - Tuniq 950 watt Miniplant review |
| ||||
| Quote:
, j/k) I have a friend who does this, but not sure how. I think he told me that when it is running out of RAM, XP automatically starts forcing the virtual memory to increase. This will slow down the system to a crawl, but then it works fine. To have it go back to using 0 virtual, you have to force it again. It can be tedious, but he seems to like it. (I run 512 DDR as well, but I'm too lazy to play with it.)I don't expect you to have any problems... The worst that can happen is the sys runs out of memory, and gives you an error message, and you have to reboot. If you tell me where to change it, I'll putz around with it too. (that's how lazy I can get.)
__________________ |
| ||||
| Re: Best performing virtual memory settings in XP? Quote:
When/if you create a pagefile, if you have multiple disks, place the pagefile on the MOST used partition of the LEAST used disk. Don't have more than one pagefile per physical disk. Also, if you preset the pagefile(s) to the same minimum and maximum size, the OS doesn't have to spent time resizing the pagefile to take into account growing/shrinking memory use. This all takes time. Lastly, if you're going to create a pagefile(s), ensure that the disk(s) have been defragmented first. That way the pagefile ends up being contigious rather than broken up. AidanII
__________________ |
| ||||
| Quote:
That way, the FS cache can remain a sensible size even if programs have allocated all memory, and failed to use half of it. AidanII
__________________ |
| ||||
| Looks like I'm going to stick with this for now - I've been trying to load the machine this morning to see what happens and haven't got it much over 270MB or so of committed memory, so I think that's a big enough margin for error. It's definitely faster (although as Spode points out XP should really use the physical stuff before the pagefile - I'm surprised they haven't sorted that out) SteveI - if you want to give it a go, try Control Panel / System / Advanced / Performance...Settings / Advanced / Virtual Memory...Change / Select "No Page File" OK out then reboot. Cheers Ally
__________________ AMD 1700XP+ ECS K7S5A 512MB DDR2100 Radeon 7500 |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are these respectable memory settings? | Rondog | AMD Motherboards & CPUs | 7 | 28th February, 2005 11:40 PM |
| Memory settings on 8kdaj | espent | EPoX MotherBoards | 1 | 26th August, 2004 03:12 PM |
| 1T & 2T memory settings available in 8rda+ | willz | EPoX MotherBoards | 2 | 8th July, 2003 07:19 AM |
| memory settings in bios | sirtoby | EPoX MotherBoards | 11 | 23rd December, 2002 07:26 PM |
| Memory settings | Pinky | AMD Motherboards & CPUs | 3 | 21st February, 2002 03:44 PM |