Editorial
|
Our editors work tirelessly trying to beat even the most rough submission into shape to present to you, after all it's their job! However, every now and then, work goes quiet. It's then you know that you need to be careful as the editors are thinking. Who knows what thoughts might lurk in their heads?
|
|
Written by Dsio
|
|
Monday, 29 January 2007 07:52 |
6 Weeks ago now, I purchased a Dell 24" LCD monitor.
I'd been desperate to upgrade from my 19" AOC CRT, and when I discovered that a new revision, "AO3" was out, which fixed the banding problems in previous revisions of the Dell 24" 2407WFP monitor, I jumped at the chance to get one for $1100 including 5 year warranty.
It was amazing. It truly was, my brand new AO3 24" LCD. Gaming was amazing, images were brilliant, programming a great deal easier, and I couldn't fault it.
Then I discovered that the Composite and S-Video ports, didn't work. At all.
Nothing. Just a jumping blur that sometimes resembled colours.
So two weeks after purchase, I asked for an RMA. It all went well, and I had a replacement at my door the next morning. That's when it all turned to hell.
. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Gizmo
|
|
Tuesday, 28 November 2006 14:04 |
|
Recently, we ran a story about Intel's research into carbon nanotube technology, and its application to semiconductor manufacturing. The take-home message from that story was that carbon nanotube tech looked promising, but was still quite a few years away from practicality, mainly due to issues with being able to repeatably produce reliable semiconducting nanotubes and integrate them into a standard silicon-based semiconductor manufacturing process..
Then I came across Nantero's web site.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Gizmo
|
|
Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:32 |
|
Bruce Schneier has an interesting piece on Forbes regarding the 'black box' voting machines. These are voting machines that tally a vote but produce no paper ballot or other physically verifiable record of the vote. His article references literally dozens of other pieces regarding issues with voting machines, and is worth reading on that basis alone. But he also references articles regarding issues with the fundamental flaws in the voting machines, ranging from the procedures used in the operation of the machines to the design of the hardware and software used with the machines. Why am I bringing this up? Several reasons, but the primary one being that our elected officials don't seem to be really interested in addressing the issue. This is our VOTE! This is how we decide who will lead us. This is how we tell our elected officials what we want them to do. When a security expert like Bruce Schneier (and he IS an expert; he designed the BlowFish and TwoFish encryption algorithms) tells us that there are fundamental problems, we might want to consider giving him an ear. This man has forgotten more about security than most of us will ever know. What's truly sad is that the people making the decisions on what equipment to purchase and use don't seem to care. A good friend of mine was invited to participate in the selection process for the voting equipment to be used in Cherokee county Kansas. He was asked to leave the selection board after he started asking too many pointed questions because they didn't want to 'get bogged down in technical issues'. Folks, I don't care what country you live in; if you have the right to vote and your election process is looking at or implementing electronic voting machines, you NEED visibility into the ENTIRE PROCESS. There are simply too many ways to cheat the process if you can't verify every step of it.
|
|
|
Written by Danrok
|
|
Monday, 16 October 2006 16:14 |
|
Will we still have a PC sitting on a desk at home in the future? Let's say in 10 years time? I think, probably not. The end of the PC home computer (and thankfully Windows along with it) has already begun. The main factors which will kill off traditional desktop computers are already in place. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Gizmo
|
|
Tuesday, 22 August 2006 18:32 |
|
BusinessWeek is reporting that Verizon is getting ready to increase DSL prices to its customers; yes, I said INCREASE prices. However, this is a 'stealth' increase. The government last year (that would be your, yes YOUR representatives and senators, not just mine) voted to deregulate the telecommunications industry. As a consequence, certain taxes that were hidden in your DSL bill are going away. That's all well and good; I tend to be generally in favor of the government staying out of things. Every time the government gets involved in something it becomes a bloody mess. But guess what Verizon has decided to do? Verizon is enacting a rate increase that is almost exactly equivalent to the amount that they are no longer paying the government in taxes. Verizon is enacting this rate increase at almost exactly the same time that the tax is set to expire. Sound a little convenient? I thought so. However, because the increase in price coincides with the reduction in taxes, the consumer will see a net effect of NOTHING in their rates. That's why I call it a 'stealth' increase, rates that should have dropped because of the tax reduction will end up remaining unchanged. So, why should the customer care? After all, it isn't affecting them, right? Wrong. If you don't start complaining, and right now, then what will happen is that instead of using that money to improve your services, Verizon will pocket that money. It will go to CTOs, CEOs, and share-holders, people who neither know of nor care about you in any way, shape, or form, except as a source of income for them. Now, don't get me wrong; I'm all for making an honest buck. You do that by rendering a good product or service at an equitable price. This, however, is so brazen that it smacks of open contemp; you are TOO STUPID to know better and even if you do, you are TOO LAZY to stop them, so their thinking goes. And you know what? If you let them get away with this: THEY ARE RIGHT If you are a Verizon customer, contact your Representatives and Senators . Contact the Federal Communications Commission. And contact Verizon. Make sure that Verizon understands that the money they get from this had BETTER be going to improve services, or you want it back.
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 3 of 8 |
|
