Thread: Gf4mx
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 8th February, 2002, 04:54 PM
Pinky Pinky is offline
Join Date: September 2001
Posts: 5,957

Originally posted by dimmreaper
Actually, I was kind of thinking I'd pick up a GF4MX 460 twinview card to replace my GF2MX 400 5.5ns SDR twinview. But then there is a 2D visual quality advantage with the GF4MX, and I don't play any DX8 only games.

I think it's like a lot of hardware, it's designed to appeal to a certain segmant of the market, but just because it's not all that doesn't mean it's a bad product.

I do think that the GF4MX 420 was a bad Idea, but I'm sure OEMs will love it.
I don't think that was the point, it's the obvious deception in the naming convention that causes my stomache to ache.
Reply With Quote